

Reichardt and Gollob (1997) discussed conditions that NHST and CI can be useful. It provides a range of plausible values to estimate the effect of interest. For example, for any null hypothesis that the change score is less than 0.7, one would reject it.ĬI kinds of focuses on the alternative hypothesis, the effect of interest.

However, a CI can be used to test multiple hypotheses. Using CI for hypothesis testing does not provide the exact p-value. Since this CI does not include 0, we would reject the null hypothesis that the change is 0 at the alpha level 0.05. Based on a pre- and post-test design, we find the confidence interval for the change after training is with the confidence level 0.95. Otherwise, we reject the null hypothesis at the significance level $\alpha$.įor example, suppose we are interested in testing whether a training intervention method is effective or not. Obtain a point estimate $\hat$, we fail to reject the corresponding null hypothesis at the significance level $\alpha$.The basic idea to get a CI is straightforward in theory but can be very difficult in practice. a 95% confidence interval reflects a significance level of 0.05. If a corresponding hypothesis test is performed, the confidence level is the complement of respective level of significance, i.e. The desired level of confidence is set by the researchers, not determined by data.When we say, "we are 99% confident that the true value of the parameter is in our confidence interval", we express that 99% of the observed confidence intervals will contain the true value of the parameter. If we conduct many separate data analyses of repeated experiment and each time we calculate a CI, the proportion of such intervals that contain the true value of the parameter matches the confidence level C ($1-\alpha$), This is called confidence level.Therefore, a CI does not necessarily cover the true parameter values at all. For a given CI, it either includes or does not include the population parameter value.

